Victor Frankenstein after achieving the impossible and building a fucking person from scraps of the dead: Oh god, ew, ew it's ugly! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew! Ew! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew!

izzy's playlists!

Discoholic đȘ©
Fai_Ryy
Sweet Seals For You, Always
Interview Vampire Daily

⣠Chile in a Photography âŁ
Noah Kahan
Lint Roller? I Barely Know Her
Aqua Utopiaïœæ”·ăźćșă§èšæ¶ă玥ă
ojovivo
h

pixel skylines
Keni
RMH
No title available
Cosmic Funnies
Cosimo Galluzzi
todays bird

romaâ

Game Changer & Make Some Noise
seen from Bangladesh

seen from Belgium
seen from Brazil

seen from Spain
seen from Iraq

seen from Malaysia
seen from United States

seen from Australia
seen from Germany

seen from United States
seen from United States

seen from Netherlands
seen from United Kingdom
seen from United States

seen from TĂŒrkiye
seen from United States

seen from Brazil

seen from United States

seen from Germany

seen from United States
@littleslicesofmelon
Victor Frankenstein after achieving the impossible and building a fucking person from scraps of the dead: Oh god, ew, ew it's ugly! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew! Ew! Yucky! Yucky! Gross! Ew!
every conversation on here increasingly feeling like this tweet
123movies & putlocker provide more for the people of this country than the army has ever
At least the army doesnât take the money creators could have made. And is also not stealing anyoneâs content. ^^
they kill people
Tbh I think the "but data centers are important infrastructure, not just AI" talking point misses that like
Ok so roads are important infrastructure. A lot of stuff that's important happens on roads. Now, let's imagine that quadrillionaire Matt Stench has decided that the next big tech innovation is the Wide Car. It's a car that takes up six lanes despite seating only one passenger.
The Wide Car is supposed to be the future, and everyone's going to be driving Wide Cars, even though nobody who makes Wide Cars is turning a profit. Employers are offering Wide Cars as an employee benefit, and getting "nah." Some employers are going as far as demanding their employees drive Wide Cars, and the result is that people take time out of their workdays to get in the mandatory gas usage for their Wide Car before driving home in a regular car.
In spite of the fact that the Wide Car is clearly set to fail, there's an enormous push to expand to twelve-lane roads to accommodate a bunch of Wide Cars that simply will not materialize. This is not an organic response to demand, but a speculative investment that amplifies the existing issues with road development for no good reason.
That is the problem.
Oh and the road infrastructure project is buying up resources other people could have used for literally anything else. With money they promise they'll be making from Wide Car sales any day now.
it should be socially acceptable to wear whatever type of clothes you want anywhere and i am not kidding
dress is an indicator of status that poor people, people of color, disabled people, some religious people, and women consistently fail to meet due to social prejudice or barriers to acquiring the appropriate clothing
obviously there are scenarios where specific clothing is required (like PPE at a job site)
but a person coming to an office job in sweatpants doesn't make them less qualified to do their work, it just means they're more comfortable while doing it
"you're required to wear a face shield, an apron/coat, and closed toed shoes in this lab environment for your safety" awesome perfect, i love safety, and i can wear whatever i want under it.
"you're required to wear a suit to present your lab work" i do not become less intelligent wearing non-formal clothing, and this presentation has now become inaccessible to someone who cannot wear appropriate formal dress
I FORGOT FAT PEOPLE IN MY ORIGINAL REBLOG, DONT REBLOG WITHOUT INCLUDING FAT PEOPLE
its 2026 i cannot handle any more fucking "author A obviously ripped off author B" discourse by people Who Have Only Seen the work of author B and admit themselves that they have no further knowledge of the literary landscape they are moving in. like.
Folks really need to reacquaint themselves with this concept
often you will see things online where you just have to be like "what a strange thing to say" or "i don't think that's true :)" to yourself and try to move on or you will lose your mind
This amount of individualism is exactly whats gonna kill us all btw
"Going a couple hours without eating a single kind of food? No thanks, I would rather kill a child" is such a wildly horrifying take to see MULTIPLE people proudly stating.
I do really think that the use of ChatGPT and genAI by students highlights the fundamental flaw of our education system focusing almost entirely on grades and test scores rather than generating curiosity and inquiry, which produces individuals who fundamentally do not understand that the purpose of an assignment is meant to be to learn *how* to do something, not simply to produce a product you can turn in to get an A+
Youâre years too late to be recognizing the threat of US government mass surveillance, bud.
good morning exclusively to the atlanticâs science editor, or whoever it is that titles their animal biology articles
fellas, theyâve done it again
me, weeping openly: potato
DEFECTOR HAS TAKEN UP THE MANTLE
this ad has me so fucked up i canât even decide what to be tired of
Okay but I'm getting approximately 10 billion terrible AI old man pretty lady ads for "eighty percent of people were born in the wrong place" and "your energy belongs in X location" and I cannot for the life of me comprehend who could possibly be benefitting from this. Countries seeking additional labor? Travel agencies??? I'm so numb to the grifts I've stopped asking why
this person married a branch of bananas
This is actually dangerous and neglectful bad parenting.Â
Babies cannot stop eating, so the risk of overeating and vomiting is much higher for them, even when closely monitored (when I was a baby even if my mom fed me for 10 minutes it was too much and I would vomit as a result). This baby will keep eating until they vomit, and she is on her back with a bottle in her mouth, so she canât even vomit properly and will run a much higher risk of asphyxiating.Â
If my spouse did this I would seriously reconsider the marriage. And I wouldnât leave them alone with the baby or any babies after them (actually I wouldnât have any more children with them unless it was adopting an older child that did not need help eating)Â until they were old enough to communicate their needs and had the ability to eat unassisted (so basically elementary school).Â
Donât do this. You are putting your child at risk.Â
-FemaleWarriorÂ
âMy husband is a horrible neglectful father putting our babyâs life at risk because he canât be bothered to feed them for once, hahaha!â
Things like this are genuinely terrifying
damn straight ppl are scaryÂ
Bottle feeding infants have no choice but to swallow to protect their airways. Bottles drip, sucking is a reflex. And they have no choice but to swallow the formula milk, and then thereâs more.
A newborn or young infant can be forced to drink far more than their tiny stomach can hold. Cue the puking.
Never prop bottles. Pay attention to babyâs cues. Look up paced bottle feeding. Respect natural feeding rhythms.
Itâs why medical professionals now recommend paced feeding (to prevent over feeding, vomiting and in the case of combination feeding - breast refusal).
http://www.peelregion.ca/parenting/feeding-baby/paced.asp
Paced bottle feeding - parenting - Region of Peel
I should note, generally breastfed babies have more control. They have to be latched and suckling to trigger the milk ejection reflex. In cases of oversupply ( yes this is a thing, I had it) babies will release the breast spluttering and choking and often clamp down to stop the flow (as painful as it sounds).
Related risk: Leaving a bottle unattended in a babyâs mouth for long enough can give the infant âbottle mouthâ if they have even the beginnings of cut teeth. Do Not Do This.
As a longtime parenting educator, can confirm, do not ever.Â
Also, a lot of the health benefits of breastfeeding arenât actually about the milkâtheyâre about the positive physical and emotional effects of skin-to-skin contact. Babies need physical touch, and lots of it, for their autonomic nervous system to release the hormones that allow them to grow and thrive.
Being held by another human and soothed by the rhythm of their breath, heartbeat, and movement is essential to creating future emotional stability and mental health. It isnât important to be The Mother or even the one whoâs lactating to provide that kind of closenessâyou just have to put in the work and hold the damn baby.
Boys almost never get taught the basics of childcare the way girls do, and we think itâs adorable when men donât know what theyâre doing with their infant children. But itâs harmful to the babies, robs those men of positive relationships with their kids, and is preventable with education.
(Iâm AFAB and was never taught anything about babies either.)
I mean, most people arenât. We have a general cultural illiteracy about early childhood development. Itâs incredibly rare to find, for example, jurisdictions where public schools offer courses in childcare the same way they might offer Spanish or Art. Youâre just supposed to âpick it upâ (usually by being a young woman in a family with babies and getting tasked with childcare, which is happening less and less these days).
(And when schools say theyâre teaching âwhat itâs like to be a parentâ theyâre usually not teaching useful parenting skills, just trying to scare kids into not having sex.)
But for what routes there are, most boys are totally excludedâmany girls begin babysitting strangersâ children to earn an extra income as young as ten, a practice which boys have typically been considered too dangerous to participate in. When public schools do teach classes about childcare, theyâre generally aimed at teen moms, not all students in general. A lot of parent education and bonding programs are specifically aimed at âmomsâ and act like cats with boots on when dads show up.Â
This is something I care about a lot because I care about preventing child abuse, and the no 1 way to do that is to educate parents about basic child care, like âItâs not good to just prop a baby up with a bottle all the timeâ or âYes they WILL scream for no fucking reason for the first three months, learn to live with itâ or â3-to-5-year-olds donât lie to your face because theyâre bad kids, theyâre just learning how reality worksâ.Â
These are the kind of things a lot of parents simply donât know, because nobody tells them and trying to look for good parenting advice on your own today is like walking with pizza into a room thatâs on fire. But men, especially, are put at a disadvantage when it comes to learning them.
If you want to have kids, please make sure you and your partner(s) learn about having kids first, so youâre not trying to wade through figuring out what is bad advice and misinformation after your child is already here and benefitting (or not) from you knowing those things.
This appears to be the presidentâs "proof" that vandals are sabotaging the Reflecting Pool.
honestly the discourse on this site is so bad that I have a new hot take: if you use tumblr at all fuck you
Checked their account: turns out op is a fucking tumblr user themselves so????? Idk :/