everything will become a dog whistle soon. yâall keep letting these males infiltrate our language, spaces, and communities. there will be nothing else for us.
Men weaponize suicide so much you couldn't pay me to give af about male suicidality.
Literally one of my first ever boyfriends constantly threatened suicide. And was sad that I was skipping a grade so he talked the principal into letting him skip a grade too (even though he was low key illiterate and in no way qualified for advancement and actually NEEDED extra time to study).
Thinking back on that situation now is kinda crazy. Lmao Like I skipped a grade because I was top 3 in class and he skipped a grade despite having horrible grades because he threw a tantrum??
Like what? Raped them? Forced them into pregnancy/abortion? Married them against their will? Revealed they have a second husband and a secret child? Kicked them put of the house when they were unemployed to bring another husband?
Men are truly nature's most pathetic creatures. "Oh boohoo 4 of my friends wanted to die last year bc they were rejected/cheated on/dumped this proves that women are evil" who fucking caaaaares oh my goddd I wanted to kill myself for 30 years straight nobody fucking cares that your bros were sad for a couple months because they are weak pissbabies with no resilience whatsoever.
thinking about when Dahlia Sky (former sex trade victim/âporn starâ) died by suicide and people were talking about how the solution to this issue should be the porn makers having a counselor on set at all times instead of simply suggesting that such an industry shouldnât exist at all. leftists once again are all about abolishing systems instead of reforming them until it comes to the ones that make their pp hard
it's very interesting how people in the replies are saying she's "strawmanning" or "ew terf content!" but have nothing to say about the racism in the pictures shown from people in their community. You people are hilarious.
A woman made a tiktok claiming to have been fired by Doordash because she reported a male client who sexually assaulted her. She had a video of the event too: the door of his home was wide open and he was laying on the couch, penis exposed, and face hidden by a hoodie. Supposedly, he's unconscious.
She reports him to the app, sending the video too, and Doordash fires her and deletes her account, so she does what people nowadays have to do to receive a lick of justice: she posts it censored on TikTok.
People believe her for the matter of 12 hours, if not less. After that, the Doordash company makes a statement saying that she was lying and that she had been fired because she shared the video. Mind you, the video was shared after the firing.
From that moment on, the app is flooded with comments from what are very clearly bot accounts that tell another story entirely: the woman found the door cracked, opened it further, and went inside his home. Doctored screenshots started making the rounds too, as well as bots and people claiming to have seen the video that proves this alternate sequence of events. No one seems to be able to share the link of this damning proof against the woman.
Then think pieces started, with tiktokers with huge platforms (thousands if not millions of followers) saying that the woman is the assaulter and the man is the victim, and asking stupid questions (what if he was high, ordered food, started to jerk off, and fell asleep? What if he doesn't like to wear pants at home and the door opened by itself? What if he had a medical emergency? What if he's narcoleptic? What if a thousand monkeys with typewriters could type Shakespeare's entire body of work?).
This woman documented an assault (because indecent exposure is a form of sexual assault) and people still decided they prefer believing the words of a mega corporation that's known for union busting and slavery practices.
It doesn't matter how well a female victim handles things and how thorough she is in the documentation of what happened to her, people will always pick her apart, find faults in her actions and behavior, and call her a liar.
I'm not gonna believe anything a man says anymore, because if they all go to this length to disbelief a woman who has UNDENIABLE proof, men will just start claiming whatever.
And stuff girls do and like is treated with contempt by men UNTIL men get interested in it, then men appoint themselves the only REAL creators / fans of The Thing. (The original Star Trek series was treated with contempt by ârealâ - male - s.f. fans as a show housewives liked, but now men act as if theyâre the ones who invented ST fandom. The same men who rhapsodize over Beatles music now dismissed the band in the early 60s because of their screaming teen-girl audiences.)
This has been a through-line in HISTORY. Kabuki theater was invented by women - but when men started doing it the first thing they did was forbid women to perform it. Novel-writing was scorned in the early 1800s as frivolous and unimportant writing fit only for the ladies who wrote and read them - but when men started writing novels they began giving each other Serious Author awards for it.
How this works in industry is similar! See: doctors are paid well except in Russia where the field is mostly female-dominated; as soon as comp sci became masculinized it gained respect and money; biology and botany were real sciences until they became feminized and are now underpaid; scientific discoveries by women are useless until men steal them and then theyâre groundbreaking and medal-/prize-winning; cooking and gardening are for women unless theyâre âagriculture and ranching,â in which case theyâre very important masculine tasks that deserve respect and proper pay and education; wine-making and brewing were invented by women until men forcibly took over and now theyâre laudable arts worthy of money, praise, and reputationâŠ. But of course women can still do the work for the men who own and run these fields, now that women had their inventions stolen, yes?
I study Chemistry and a trainee. I went eating with the highest bosses all males and my direct boss was like âWhy did you pick Chemistry?â
âBecause I like it. I know not a cool answer like I want to discover things but why would I want to do that if itâs going to be stolen by men as soon as I discover it? Besides, I wish to have children someday. Meaning as soon as my belly grows I will lose my job anyway. Thatâs how it works here (in Scientific fields) is it not? Woman pregnant, woman loses her job. Man takes over her research? Iâm just happy being able to do what I like. I leave the competitivness to you guys. Just be careful to not ruin each other.â
I was scared the moment I blurted everything out and for a moment everyone was quiet. The most sexist of them started to defend himself whereas the higher-ups quickly shushed him. âSheâs right.â
The CSO told me then that his wife is an activist and leading member of a feminist organisation regarding women in Scientific fields and my answer inspired him. If it would be alright to share my contact with her. Also that if I ever notice something that I must report it to him direcrly. After that I read the company regulations and there I saw a zero tolerance towards bullying and sexism because aparently before him the company suffered immensly with these two things. Also the CSOâs next in line is a young woman who is already being hated by some sexist men who threaten to leave the company not knowing that they are all replaceable. She isnât.
I hate the entire concept of rehabilitating a rapist. Rapists aren't ill. Raping is not a symptom. It is a misogynistic hate crime. Stop letting violent men pathologize themselves out of consequences. They're not the ones suffering from what they've done.
Not only do rapists already know that rape is bad, but that is arguably the aspect of their crime that is most arousing to them. No amount of âeducatingâ them that rape is horrible and women are human or anything will reverse that mindset
Mens reactions to a story about women being brutally raped while on vacation in Dubai. It shouldnât surprise me anymore but it always does.
Men are happy enough to share these comments on a public platform, with their real name and photo of themselves. But we are meant to believe they give a shit about consent? We are meant to believe they view women as fully people?
Women get condemned for being naive, but what young person isnât naive and trusting, who doesnât want to have a good time on holiday? Nothing is said about the men who attack us and rape us.
the doublethink goes crazy. if you go out you should expect to get raped but if youâre afraid of men youâre being a hysterical bitch. not all men! just choose better! oh you have standards, like wanting to be treated like a human being? stop being so picky and just give him chance. itâs your fault that there is a male loneliness epidemic, and you should care about that more than your own rights
This is why I say itâs all men. Only a few are making these comments, but look at the amount of likes. Hundreds agree with these victim blaming comments.
Also I just saw an article that said misogyny towards female teachers is rising from young boys (something I agree with as a teacher). The majority of the reactions were the laughing emoji, and comments from men stating that it was due to a rise in misandry and therefore deserved had likes in the THOUSANDS.
I'm ngl the recent need to assign every woman an "aesthetic", to put her into a box and label her as a specific "type" of woman (a clean girl, an alt girl, a cottagecore girl, or most obviously, a goth girl) is reminiscent of how women are labelled in porn; infact I'd argue it's pretty much identical. Men use these "aesthetics" to describe a type of woman he wants, as if we're a dog breed. When he says he wants a "goth girl", he means a specific type of woman portrayed in a pornographic light; kinky, bossy, big tits. When he says he wants a clean girl, he's also describing a porn category; he wants a woman who is unnaturally hairless, face caked on with makeup to hide any form of "blemish" but in a way that looks "natural" so he can continue living in the lie that porn has promised him, a woman who appears simple and won't cause much of a fuss, and so will bend to his will. Aesthetics are capitalistic by nature, but they are also deeply embedded into patriarchy; they convince you to focus on becoming a type of woman, while also robbing you of your money and your thoughts at the same time. The men are fucking us over twice with the same idea. Two birds, one stone.
The way abuse fetishists get away with what they do is insane and reflective of cultural misogyny beyond that sphere. men mistreating women is not uncommon, and postmodernism has helped sanitize male violence even more. when you're a woman being abused because it's clearly trauma bonding or you've been groomed or there's something wrong, It's probably uncomfortable to accept that you were being abused to begin with and that it was wrong. because the culture at large doesn't really care. It's already uncomfortable to talk about sexual matters in public and so the abuse that women suffer often remains private and it's only shared with close friends because it's so embarrassing women are afraid of the repercussions of making whatever they've suffered public.
abusive men get called out, they get reported to the law, only to marry women with children and be a risk to them It's just insane.
you need to stop sealioning feminists that are clearly uncomfortable with sexualized abuse. most people are uncomfortable with sexualized abuse and you need to ask yourself why you feel so compelled to defend it
I am trying to engage in a discussion. If the person is uncomfortable with the mere idea of BDSM, I can be blocked. I will not try to harass them. i simply replied to a few posts.
People being uncomfortable with this is completely alright, but what is not alright is to claim a moral high ground because you do not personally like this kink.
I also want to make clesr that you ignore my point that this kink is not exclusive to dominant males x submissive females.
Ancient Hatred and Its Contemporary Manifestation: The Torture of Lesbians by Susan Hawthorne, Ph.D. Victoria University
abusive men in the kink scene in their own words:
đŹ 0  đ 1586  â€ïž 1602 · this was such a heavy read so tw everyone đ
3 lies that kinksters tell you about BDSM to distract you from their sexual human rights abuses.
Content warning: descriptions of kink torture.
First of all: sorry for writing so much more about kink culture lately, you all know me as âthat ex-prostitute who fights the sex industry (and whoâs personal long posts nobody really reblogs, but i write them anyway)â after all. But kink culture is mainstreaming and i firmly believe this is either a result of porn culture or intersects with it. After all, cultural changes expand if not stopped: rape culture â> porn culture â> kink culture. Not that sexual sadism isnât as old as patriarchy itself, but it certainly is mainstream now.
Okay: when i first got educated on sex (which was very insufficient, even for a country that brags about their sex ed), how it was explained to us, was like this: when a man and a woman love each other, they want to be close together, so close that they want to be inside each other, this act of love making is sex. And that is a pretty idealist way of phraming things, maybe you could even call it dishonest, because it doesât reflect reality. In reality men fuck, pound, bang, shag, destroy or screw women. It is honest in one way though: it forgot about homosexuality, society does that too.
So why am i telling this? Because kinksters explain their brutality in sweet talk like this too, i did that too to talk about my masochistic âsexual orientationâ. To cloud whatâs really going on. So here are 3 lies kinksters tell you to get away with rape and abuse:
1. Pain can feel like pleasure. The argument: âthe parts of the brain that register pain, pleasure and itchiness are close together and sometimes overlap. This is why scratching (pain) elevates itchiness: you blend the sensation and feel pleasure/relief scratching an itch. Kinksters utilise this blending of sensations to feel pleasure too. We all like a little pain in a way.â
The truth: this might as well be true, i donât even care. But facts remain that pain is a warning side of your body that something is wrong. Scratching an itch is not the same as beating your partner with a cane untill sheâs bleeding. And most of all: sadists donât necessarily want the masochist to feel pleasure. In my decade in the scene i noticed 2 types of sadists (Doms not included, Doms are about power, not pain per se). Type 1 who really wants their victim to suffer, to not enjoy it. They love playing with subs (not masochists). Type 2 who simply doesnât care, which is a great match for a masochist. They just want to destroy, to reduce the physicality of their object of desire. The problem is that sadism is wrong, unethical, acted out itâs a form of non-state torture. The masochistâs itch that âneedsâ to be scratched with a knife or a whip is irrelevant.
2. Itâs all about trusting your partner. The argument: âBDSM relationships are deep, intense relationships (unlike vanilla ones) that demand trust between partners. You give your partner your body and mind or recieve theirs, that trust is a beautiful thing. Why would anyone consider this special bond wrong?â
The truth: of course there are plenty of these relationships and theyâre still abusive as fuck. But what bothers me is that itâs a lie. In the BDSM community, monogamous relationships are less common than outside of it and there is more acceptance of polygamy. Which is neutral of course. But itâs also true that this âspecial bondâ with 3 other people is kind of⊠not as special as what youâre telling others? This argument romanticises BDSM to sell it to the rest of the world, hiding its abusive nature. Itâs way more common that a BDSM community is more like a marketplace of desires, fantasies and subculture. People would play with interesting strangers at playparties. Why not be honest and champion this concept? Itâs actually one of the few things i really liked about the BDSM scene: the open communication about desire and breaking down the monopoly of âman owns woman, woman is dependent on man for love and affectionâ. The only shitty thing you did with it was âall men own woman, she exists for male pleasureâ, instead of having a huge group of friends who were all casually intimate with oneanother. From sleeping in each otherâs arms to playing and from sex to cheating with +1 invites to parties.
3. Safe, sane and consensual. The argument: âitâs not like we just go around beating people and doing whatever. We actually learn skills on how to safely work with the body, inflicting pain, doing bondage, we even read up on psychology. This is why young girls tend to end up with an older man so often: he has the experience that balances her inexperience. We live by these rules, BECAUSE we are not abusers.â
The truth: every single one of these statements is a lie. There is no Dom-school (ironically there actually is âslave trainingâ, thatâs a pretty big thing). Yes, there are workshops, but there is no requirement for a Dom to start doing BDSM. And since Doms tend to be pompous, narcistic bastards, many tend to blow their experience level out of proportion. Which often resulted in funny, yet dangerous, situations where i had to guide the activity WHILE SUBBING. Older men do not have more experience, some do, many donât. Older men prey in young girls because theyâre vulnerble, like tight young flesh and the thrill is to break a porcelaine doll (which i wrote about before, see my #legalisedlies tag). Many kinksters learn safety skills to prevent killing their partner, they donât want to end up in jail. If they cared about safety, they would wear a condom more often and not practise BDSM. Many BDSM activities cannot be done safely, thatâs why they came up with the newer code Risk Aware Consensual Kink. But itâs never the Dom who faces the risks, itâs the sub who needs to go to the hospital when something goes wrong.
Welcome! This channel educates on the harms of sadomasochism, which is also known as S/M, S&M, or BDSM. (BONDAGE, DISCIPLINE [or DOMINANCE o
guys im tellin ya when terfs finally learn about intersex people theyre gonna blow a gasket n lose their heads.
you think men cant have a uterus and women cant have dicks? honey youre only seeing a tiny piece of the picture, youre denial and reducing people to their genitals out of ignorance is making you so blind.
males canât have functional uteri & have to get them removed & no woman would be born with a functional penis, only an abnormally shaped/formed vulva because those sex organs are not compatible with their sex. hence why they have rare medical conditions and arenât normal phenotypes for their sex. crazy right
Intersex advocates have actually asked you people to stop using them as pawns to pretend like the sex binary doesn't exist. DSDs work within the sex binary because they are actually divided by sex.
Ex...
Klinefelter Syndrome (XXY) - Only occurs in males
Turner Syndrome (X) - Only occurs in females
Trisomy X Syndrome (XXX) - Only occurs in females
XXXY Syndrome (XXXY) - Only occurs in males
Even ambiguous genitalia like you described are divided by sex, because they form differently between members of either (yes, either) sex.
Ambiguous genitalia for females includes things such as enlarged clitori, and for males, micropenises. Hermaphroditism doesn't exist, and has been debunked by actual intersex groups.
I encourage you to look through this imterview with intersex advocate Claire Graham (diagnosed with MRKH) wherein she weighs in on the sex binary and how intersex disorders exist within it, not outside of it.
The Trans Cult and its obsession with pointing at a poor example of their delusions and thinking it will convince anyone but the most brain-dead of bootlickers needs to be studied...
